In
hubris, they imposed a radical liberal agenda on an
unwilling centrist electorate. Now, the economic recovery is
failing and voters are set to rebuke Democrats in November.
From
electing Scott Brown in Massachusetts
to vociferous dissent at town meetings, Americans
made it clear they did not want the Democrats'
health care reforms.
Those create vast new entitlements, levy higher taxes,
impose mandates on businesses and state budgets, and
increase demand for medical services and drugs, without
expanding the supply of health professionals or loosening
the monopoly grip of pharmaceutical companies. It imposes
few meaningful cost controls.
As feared, businesses face runaway employee health insurance
costs, dramatically increasing their incentives to outsource
more jobs to Asia.
The financial reform law creates employment
for liberal lawyers and community activists in the federal
bureaucracy to write 500 new regulations and staff a new
consumer watchdog that will duplicate reforms for credit
cards, bank accounts and consumer loans already being put in
place by the Federal Reserve.
The big banks are still too big to fail, controlling a
larger share of the nation's deposits than before the
crisis.
Restrictions on bank trading and derivatives miss the mark.
Bad loans, not trading, took down Citigroup and
Bank of America, and few effective
restrictions or controls are imposed on mortgage-backed
securities and similar financial instruments that permitted
giant banks to disguise lousing lending decisions from
unknowing investors.
The financial system is even more vulnerable to abuse and
collapse than before.
The 8000 regional banks remain cash starved, because the
President failed to use the TARP to create an analog to the
Savings and Loan Crisis era Resolution Trust to purge
balance sheets of toxic real estate loans and mortgage
backed securities. Big Democratic contributors at
Goldman Sachs,
J.P. Morgan
and other New York financial houses are making too much
money working out those financial instruments, and the
President acceded to their pleas for profits, against the
best interests of jobs creation.
Now, small and medium sized businesses that rely on regional
banks for credit can't expand and add employees. For
ordinary working families, credit is scarcer and more
expensive. Neither phenomenon is good for jobs creation.
Having failed to push a carbon tax through a voter wary
Senate, the President is intent on punishing energy use by
executive fiat through the Environmental Projection Agency.
The Council of Economic Advisors claims the
$787 billion stimulus package saved or created about three
million jobs but the Administration head count of jobs
directly funded by the economic Recovery Act simply
contracts the assumptions behind this analysis.
A
good deal of the money was wasted or delayed private hiring,
exacerbating unemployment. For example, subsidies to build
windmills or green buildings displace other investments in
new generating capacity and commercial space but don't add
to the kilowatts purchased and office space rented two and
three years from now. The economy gets the same
investments-those just costs more and gets postponed.
The President managed to make much temporary stimulus
spending permanent, creating trillion dollar deficits for
many years to come and endangering the federal government's
triple-A bond rating. Obama's response is to increase income
and estate taxes, and Pelosi is floating a national sales
tax. None of those create jobs.
Signs abound that the economic recovery is faltering under
the weight of statism. Retails sales and new home
construction are sinking, Obama's inept Treasury and housing
bureaucrats can't stem foreclosure for two million families
this year, and non-financial companies are sitting on nearly
$2 trillion in cash reluctant to invest and hire.
Now, the President's Harvard bred, Wall Street fed,
Washington dressed economists tell Americans they must
endure high unemployment and declining incomes for most of
this decade.
Maybe common folk who vote and earn a living in the real
world know something Ivy League professors living off
endowment income and advising presidents can't fathom.
Reckless, unproductive government spending, higher taxes and
regulations that accomplish little but to raise costs, kill
investment, drive jobs offshore, and destroy prosperity.
It simply is not in Obama and Pelosi's DNA to believe
ordinary people know what's good for them.
Thankfully, the first Democrats, Thomas Jefferson and James
Madison, gave common folk a remedy for the arrogance of
aristocrats --
elections every two years.